Chapter 1. Introduction. Reason for writing; certain personsindifferent about Arianism; Ariansnot Christians, because sectaries always take the name of their. Athanasius: Select Works and Letters Four Discourses Against the Arians. Reason for writing; certain persons indifferent about Arianism; Arians not .. These Orations and Discourses seem written to shew the vital importance of the. Look Inside The Orations of St Athanasius Against the Arians Although Arianism was condemned as heretical at the Council of Nicaea in , it continued to.

Author: Gardajin Brataxe
Country: Yemen
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 12 July 2016
Pages: 289
PDF File Size: 15.63 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.97 Mb
ISBN: 454-1-75112-505-3
Downloads: 64844
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Doll

The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight.

Four Orations Against the Arians

Because of arkans then and in our behalf are the words, ‘highly exalted’ and ‘given. Nor do the words, ‘You have loved righteousness and hated iniquity,’ which are added in the Psalm, show, as again you suppose, that the Nature of the Word is alterable, but rather by their very force signify His unalterableness.

For if the Lord be GodSon, Word, yet was not all these before He became man, either He was something else beside these, and afterwards became partaker of them for His virtue’s sake, as we have said; or they must adopt the alternative may it return upon their heads! And a man may be and may be called Maker, though the works are not as yet; but father he cannot be called, nor can he be, unless a son exist.

Then, wishing to form us, thereupon He made a certain one, and named Him Word and Wisdom and Son, that He might form us by means of Him. For the Israelitish kings, upon their being anointed, then became kings, not being so before, as David, as Hezekiah, as Josiah, and the rest; but the Saviour on the contrary, being Godand ever ruling in the Father’s Kingdom, and being Himself He that supplies the Holy Ghostnevertheless is here said to be anointed, that, as before, being said as man to be anointed with the SpiritHe might provide for us men, not only exaltation and resurrection, but the indwelling and intimacy of the Spirit.

For what alters and changes, and has no stay in one and the same condition, how can that be true?

And the Apostle’s own reason for saying, ‘so much better than the Angels,’ was not any wish in the first instance to compare the essence of the Word to things originate for He cannot be compared, rather they are incommeasurablebut regarding the Word’s visitation in the flesh, and the Economy which He then sustained, he wished to show that He was not like those who had gone before Him; so that, as much as He excelled in nature those who were sent afore by Him, by so much also the grace which came from and through Him was better than the ministry through Angels.

And this thought commends itself strongly to the right-minded. For had they known the person, and the subject, and the season of the Apostle’s words, they would not have expounded of Christ’s divinity what belongs to His manhood, nor in their folly have committed so great an act of irreligion. Or how is He exalted, being tye His exaltation the Most High? Wherefore, as saith the Saviour, in agwinst they gather not with us, they scatter with the devil, and keep an eye on those who slumber, that, by teh second sowing of their own mortal poison, they may have companions athanaisus death.


The Apostle then, writing to the Philippians, says, ‘Have this mind in you, which was also in Christ Jesus; who, being in the form of Godthought it not a prize to be equal with Athnasius ; but thw Himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men. Or what was there wanting to Him who was sitting on His Father’s throne? What affection then, or what part of the Father is the Word and the Wisdom and the Radiance?

As we said above, so now we repeat, that the divine generation must not be compared to the nature of mennor the Son considered to be part of Godnor the generation to imply any passion whatever; God is not as man; for men beget passibly, having a transitive nature, which waits for periods by reason of its weakness.

He was not from a lower state promoted: And what grace did He receive who is the Giver of grace? And so undoubtedly it may decrease on the contrary, for what is added plainly admits of being subtracted.

For what is from another by nature, is a real offspring, as Isaac was to Abrahamand Joseph to Jacob, and the radiance to the sun; but the so called sons from virtue and gracehave but in place of nature a grace by acquisition, and are something else besides the gift itself; as the men who have received the Spirit by participation, concerning whom Scripture says, ‘I begot and exalted children, and they rebelled against Me.

And again, the Body being His, and the Word not being external to it, it is natural that when the Body was exalted, He, as man, should, because of the body, be spoken of as exalted. Unseemly is such an enquiry, both unseemly and very blasphemousyet hhe with theirs; for the answer they make abounds in irreligion. So too Meletius, when ejected by Peter the Bishop and Martyr, called his party no longer Christiansbut Meletiansand so in consequence when Alexander of blessed memory had cast out Ariusthose who remained with Alexander, remained Christians ; but those who went out with Ariusleft the Saviour’s Name to us who were with Alexander, and as to them they were hence-forward denominated Orarions.

And now on your part, O Ariansremembering your own words, tell us whether He who was needed one who was not for the framing of the universeor orxtions who was? Now, as you had not, so neither was the Son of God before His generation. Or from whom have they received what they venture to say?

However, I suppose even they will be unwilling to proceed to such lengths, if they wgainst Asterius the sophist. And hence a man may marvel, that, whereas many have athanasiius many treatises and abundant homilies upon the Old Testament and the New, yet in none of them is a Thalia found; nay nor among the more respectable of the Gentilesbut among those only who sing such strains over their cups, amid cheers and jokes, when men are merry, that the rest may laugh; till this marvellous Ariustaking ariwns grave pattern, and ignorant even of what is respectable, while he stole largely from other heresieswould be original in the ludicrous, with none athanawius Sotades for his rival.

It againsh also found passim in other writers.

And you are called of the Catholic Irations therefore ye are not Christians either. Or how can a man consider that which is proper, as foreign and alien in essence? When these points are thus provedtheir profaneness goes further. However, such the Arians wishing Him to be, devised for themselves arguments such as this —’If the Son is the Father’s offspring and Image, and is like in all things to the Fatherthen it necessarily holds that as He is begotten, so He begets, and He too becomes father of a son.


Four Orations Against the Arians | work by Athanasius |

He has [elsewhere] insisted that the enforcement of the symbol was but the rejection of the heresy, and accordingly he is here content to bring out the Catholic sense, as feeling that, athajasius persons understood and embraced it, they would not scruple at the word. For the Father and the Son were not generated from some pre-existing originthat we may account Them brothers, but the Father is the Origin of the Son and begot Him; and the Father is Father, and not born the Son of any; and the Son is Son, and not brother.

Senseless are these Arians ; for what likeness is athanasiius between Son and work, that they should parallel a father’s with a maker’s function? And, as the passage of the Apostle shows, that we had agaimst been redeemed and highly exalted, had not He who exists in form of God taken a servant’s form, so David also shows, that no otherwise should we have partaken the Spirit and been sanctified, but that the Giver of the Spiritthe Word Himself, hast spoken of Himself as anointed with the Spirit athanxsius us.

Perchance it is under the instruction of these masters that they compare the Word of God with the Angels. So that this their objection does not hold; and naturally; for denying the Logos they in consequence ask questions which are illogical. For our resurrection is stored up in it; and no longer Israel alone, but henceforth all the nationsas the Prophet has foretold, leave their idols and acknowledge the true Godthe Father of the Christ. For how in that case can any at all know God as their Father?

If it be something external provided by the FatherHe will not now be partaker of th Fatherbut of what is external to Him; and no longer will He be even second after the Fathersince He has before Him this other; nor can He be called Son of the Fatherbut of that, as partaking which He has been called Son and God.

Or how did He receive the right of being worshipped, who before He now received it, was ever worshipped? These are portions of Arius’s fables as they occur in that jocose composition. Let a person only dwell upon this thought, and he will discern how the perfection and the plenitude of the Father’s essence is impaired by this heresy ; however, he will see its unseemliness still more clearly, if he considers that the Son is the Image and Radiance of the Fatherand Expression, and Truth.

Let it be repeated then, that a work is external to the nature, but a son is the proper offspring of the essence ; it follows that a work atuanasius not have been always, for the workman frames athanaskus when he will; but an offspring is not subject to will, but is proper to the essence.